<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thai Mystery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teakpepper.com/teakpepper/2008/06/16/thai-mystery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teakpepper.com/teakpepper/2008/06/16/thai-mystery/</link>
	<description>Mark Perlson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:20:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Pederzani</title>
		<link>http://www.teakpepper.com/teakpepper/2008/06/16/thai-mystery/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Pederzani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teakpepper.com/?p=9#comment-21</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure why I was so convinced that it is a legitimate design.  I have, however, seen it before.  It was part of a set of 24 mills sold by Wright in 2003.  See: http://www.wright-inc.com/auctions/view/RJN/F569/1/101

From that, I&#039;m pretty sure that it&#039;s legitimate.
Lot 133 from the 2005 auction is a different story.  Architonic claims that 2 of the 24 peppermills weren&#039;t produced by Dansk, but all of them are styles I&#039;ve seen before.  Read the verbiage on  http://www.architonic.com/4106434 and compare it to http://www.wright-inc.com/auctions/view/BORT/F57U/2/133 -- the Wright site doesn&#039;t claim that two aren&#039;t Dansk!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why I was so convinced that it is a legitimate design.  I have, however, seen it before.  It was part of a set of 24 mills sold by Wright in 2003.  See: <a href="http://www.wright-inc.com/auctions/view/RJN/F569/1/101" rel="nofollow">http://www.wright-inc.com/auctions/view/RJN/F569/1/101</a></p>
<p>From that, I&#8217;m pretty sure that it&#8217;s legitimate.<br />
Lot 133 from the 2005 auction is a different story.  Architonic claims that 2 of the 24 peppermills weren&#8217;t produced by Dansk, but all of them are styles I&#8217;ve seen before.  Read the verbiage on  <a href="http://www.architonic.com/4106434" rel="nofollow">http://www.architonic.com/4106434</a> and compare it to <a href="http://www.wright-inc.com/auctions/view/BORT/F57U/2/133" rel="nofollow">http://www.wright-inc.com/auctions/view/BORT/F57U/2/133</a> &#8212; the Wright site doesn&#8217;t claim that two aren&#8217;t Dansk!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Pederzani</title>
		<link>http://www.teakpepper.com/teakpepper/2008/06/16/thai-mystery/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Pederzani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teakpepper.com/?p=9#comment-3</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a legitimate design.  It is the first time I noticed any of the mills being knocked off, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a legitimate design.  It is the first time I noticed any of the mills being knocked off, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

